Conversion Research Sprint
Funnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
A structured test programme built for buyers who research for three weeks and buy on a different device than the one they started on.
Delivered remotely for brands across Denver and Colorado.
Countdown timers do not work here. Neither does 'only 2 left' on a product someone is going to compare against three competitors, two forum threads and a YouTube review before they spend $480. Denver's dominant categories are considered purchases, and manufactured urgency reads as dishonest to an audience that has already decided you might be overselling.
That changes the entire test backlog. Instead of pressure tactics we test information architecture: what the buyer needs to know, in what order, and how many clicks currently sit between them and it. Fit confidence. Spec comparison. Warranty and repair visibility. Return policy framing. Whether the reviews on the page answer the question the buyer actually has, or just say 'love it'.
It also changes the measurement window. A long consideration cycle means cross-device journeys, a returning-visitor share far above the DTC average, and last-click attribution that lies to you more than usual. We instrument for that before running a single experiment, then run tests to a pre-declared sample size and report the losers as plainly as the winners.
Colorado demand is not a flat line you can sample from evenly. A winter hardgoods brand does a disproportionate share of its year between the first real Front Range snowfall and the end of the holiday window, and a summer category compresses into the months between runoff and the first hard freeze. Testing inside a spike gives you fast reads on a distorted sample — heavier gift traffic, more first-time visitors, different price sensitivity. So we invert the calendar: the heavy research and experimentation work runs in the shoulder season so winners are hard-coded and live before demand arrives, and during peak we shift to monitoring, guardrail metrics and segment-level readouts rather than launching new variants into the busiest six weeks of your year.
The same standard of work we run for every client — applied to a Denver brand’s realities.
Full service detailFunnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
Every hypothesis scored on impact, confidence and effort, with the projected revenue and required sample size stated up front. You always know what runs next and why.
Tests built and QA'd across devices, browsers and your app stack, with flicker-free rendering and no measurable hit to Core Web Vitals.
Pre-declared sample sizes, sequential-testing guardrails and segment-level readouts by device, traffic source and new versus returning. No peeking, no calling a test at 80%.
Cart drawer, shipping thresholds, payment options, express checkout placement and post-purchase upsell, tested against AOV and revenue per session rather than clicks.
Tests run, results in full, cumulative revenue impact and what the results taught us about your customers. Losers are reported in the same detail as winners.
We do not work off a rate card. Every Denver engagement starts with a fixed statement of work — named deliverables, named dates, one number — written after we have looked at your store, not before. If a smaller first step would serve you better, we will say so.
Get this scopedWe instrument the funnel properly first. Most stores have broken or double-counted events, and you cannot optimise against numbers you cannot trust.
Quant tells us where visitors leave. Qual tells us why. We combine analytics, replays and direct customer input before writing a single hypothesis.
Hypotheses are scored and sequenced so the highest-value, lowest-effort tests run first. The roadmap is shared and you can reorder it.
Two to four concurrent experiments depending on traffic, each run to a pre-declared sample size. No test gets stopped early because it looks good on day three.
Winners get hard-coded into the theme, losers get documented, and every result feeds the next round of hypotheses. The programme gets smarter each month.
Anonymised under NDA. Figures pulled from the client’s own analytics.
8-figure DTC brand, ~140 SKUs, US + CA · Shopify Plus (migrated from Magento 2)
Magento 2 cost $9k a month in hosting, extensions and emergency dev before a single feature shipped. Mobile LCP sat at 5.4 seconds and mobile converted at less than half the desktop rate across 68% of sessions. The named constraint: 11,412 indexed URLs and a top-3 organic position on their hero category, so a migration that lost rankings would cost more than the platform ever saved.
~$6M/yr DTC, 900+ SKUs across size and colour variants, US · Shopify Plus
Returns ran at 31% and refund cost consumed the entire paid media margin. One size chart image served 40 different fits, and 62% of add-to-carts started on a collection page that never showed variant availability. The named constraint: no new product photography budget, so every fix had to come out of the existing asset library and the review corpus.
“We'd been running our own tests for a year and calling every 3% swing a win. The first thing they did was tell us our sample sizes were garbage, which was not a fun call to sit through. Six months later we're getting wins that actually hold up when you re-measure them. Sitewide CVR went from 1.9% to 2.7%.”
Thirty minutes with the strategist who would actually run your account. We screen-share your store, read your data live, and tell you the three highest-value things we can see from the outside.
Prefer to write it out? [email protected] gets a real reply the same business day, Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm MT.