Conversion Research Sprint
Funnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
A structured experimentation programme on your Phoenix store — hypotheses, sample sizes, and results we publish including the losers.
Delivered remotely for brands across Phoenix and Arizona.
The most testable asset a Phoenix merchant owns is the delivery promise. You can genuinely reach a large share of the western United States in a day or two from here, and almost nobody surfaces that on the page where the decision is made. That single element — real date, real cutoff, real stock — is the first thing we put into a test queue for a store in this metro, and it is the one that most reliably wins.
After that the Phoenix backlog diverges from a coastal one. For fitment catalogues the experiment is where the year-make-model selector lives and what happens when it returns nothing. For supplement and aesthetics brands out of Scottsdale it is subscription framing and the cadence choice at the point of purchase. For pool and patio it is how early freight cost appears before the cart evaporates at step three.
We run it as a programme rather than a pile of hunches. Quantitative research to find where revenue leaks, session replay and customer input to explain why, then a backlog ranked by expected revenue against build cost — with fitment and delivery-promise hypotheses weighted up, because those are where Phoenix catalogues lose people. Tests run to a pre-declared sample size or they get called.
Phoenix has two demand calendars running at once and both distort test reads if you ignore them. The winter visitor season from roughly October through March brings a materially different buyer — older, higher intent, often shipping to a temporary Arizona address — and the Cactus League and event weeks in February and March put a spike of out-of-state traffic through local brands. Meanwhile the summer is not a dead season, it is an inverted one: hydration, cooling, pool and indoor categories peak while anything outdoor-and-effortful collapses. We segment test readouts by season and by whether the shipping address matches the billing state, because a test that wins in January on snowbird traffic and loses in July is not a losing test, it is a badly reported one.
The same standard of work we run for every client — applied to a Phoenix brand’s realities.
Full service detailFunnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
Every hypothesis scored on impact, confidence and effort, with the projected revenue and required sample size stated up front. You always know what runs next and why.
Tests built and QA'd across devices, browsers and your app stack, with flicker-free rendering and no measurable hit to Core Web Vitals.
Pre-declared sample sizes, sequential-testing guardrails and segment-level readouts by device, traffic source and new versus returning. No peeking, no calling a test at 80%.
Cart drawer, shipping thresholds, payment options, express checkout placement and post-purchase upsell, tested against AOV and revenue per session rather than clicks.
Tests run, results in full, cumulative revenue impact and what the results taught us about your customers. Losers are reported in the same detail as winners.
We do not work off a rate card. Every Phoenix engagement starts with a fixed statement of work — named deliverables, named dates, one number — written after we have looked at your store, not before. If a smaller first step would serve you better, we will say so.
Get this scopedWe instrument the funnel properly first. Most stores have broken or double-counted events, and you cannot optimise against numbers you cannot trust.
Quant tells us where visitors leave. Qual tells us why. We combine analytics, replays and direct customer input before writing a single hypothesis.
Hypotheses are scored and sequenced so the highest-value, lowest-effort tests run first. The roadmap is shared and you can reorder it.
Two to four concurrent experiments depending on traffic, each run to a pre-declared sample size. No test gets stopped early because it looks good on day three.
Winners get hard-coded into the theme, losers get documented, and every result feeds the next round of hypotheses. The programme gets smarter each month.
Anonymised under NDA. Figures pulled from the client’s own analytics.
8-figure DTC brand, ~140 SKUs, US + CA · Shopify Plus (migrated from Magento 2)
Magento 2 cost $9k a month in hosting, extensions and emergency dev before a single feature shipped. Mobile LCP sat at 5.4 seconds and mobile converted at less than half the desktop rate across 68% of sessions. The named constraint: 11,412 indexed URLs and a top-3 organic position on their hero category, so a migration that lost rankings would cost more than the platform ever saved.
~$6M/yr DTC, 900+ SKUs across size and colour variants, US · Shopify Plus
Returns ran at 31% and refund cost consumed the entire paid media margin. One size chart image served 40 different fits, and 62% of add-to-carts started on a collection page that never showed variant availability. The named constraint: no new product photography budget, so every fix had to come out of the existing asset library and the review corpus.
“We'd been running our own tests for a year and calling every 3% swing a win. The first thing they did was tell us our sample sizes were garbage, which was not a fun call to sit through. Six months later we're getting wins that actually hold up when you re-measure them. Sitewide CVR went from 1.9% to 2.7%.”
Thirty minutes with the strategist who would actually run your account. We screen-share your store, read your data live, and tell you the three highest-value things we can see from the outside.
Prefer to write it out? [email protected] gets a real reply the same business day, Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm MT.