Conversion Research Sprint
Funnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
Same attention, more revenue per visitor — a structured test programme designed around LA's spiky, content-driven traffic.
Delivered remotely for brands across Los Angeles and California.
Testing in Los Angeles is statistically awkward and nobody says so. A market where a single Reel can deliver a quarter of the month's sessions in ninety minutes breaks the assumption most CRO methodology rests on: that traffic arrives at a roughly steady rate from a roughly stable mix of sources. Run a naive test across a drop and you have measured the drop, not the variant.
So the programme is built differently. Tests are stratified by traffic source and segmented so organic search, paid social and a creator's link-in-bio are read separately. Spike days are pre-declared as inclusions or exclusions before the test starts, not decided afterwards when the result is inconvenient. Sample size is calculated against your actual daily distribution rather than a monthly average that no day in your calendar resembles.
The other LA-specific thing is where the money hides. In an apparel-heavy market the biggest recoverable revenue is usually not the add-to-cart button — it is the gap between what the product page promises and what arrives in the box. We test fit guidance, fabric and drape communication, model diversity in imagery and exchange-first post-purchase flows, and we measure them against contribution margin after returns rather than raw conversion rate.
Two operational realities shape a Los Angeles test programme. First, demand is event-driven: launches, collabs, festival season, a piece of content that happens to travel. That means test windows have to be planned against your content calendar and validated for source mix, or every readout is contaminated. Second, LA sits in Pacific time while a large share of its buyers do not — a store here typically sees East Coast traffic peak while the LA office is at lunch and a long Pacific evening tail. We segment device and daypart accordingly, because a mobile visitor at 9pm Pacific browsing a swim collection behaves nothing like a desktop visitor at 10am Eastern, and averaging them together hides both.
The same standard of work we run for every client — applied to a Los Angeles brand’s realities.
Full service detailFunnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
Every hypothesis scored on impact, confidence and effort, with the projected revenue and required sample size stated up front. You always know what runs next and why.
Tests built and QA'd across devices, browsers and your app stack, with flicker-free rendering and no measurable hit to Core Web Vitals.
Pre-declared sample sizes, sequential-testing guardrails and segment-level readouts by device, traffic source and new versus returning. No peeking, no calling a test at 80%.
Cart drawer, shipping thresholds, payment options, express checkout placement and post-purchase upsell, tested against AOV and revenue per session rather than clicks.
Tests run, results in full, cumulative revenue impact and what the results taught us about your customers. Losers are reported in the same detail as winners.
We do not work off a rate card. Every Los Angeles engagement starts with a fixed statement of work — named deliverables, named dates, one number — written after we have looked at your store, not before. If a smaller first step would serve you better, we will say so.
Get this scopedWe instrument the funnel properly first. Most stores have broken or double-counted events, and you cannot optimise against numbers you cannot trust.
Quant tells us where visitors leave. Qual tells us why. We combine analytics, replays and direct customer input before writing a single hypothesis.
Hypotheses are scored and sequenced so the highest-value, lowest-effort tests run first. The roadmap is shared and you can reorder it.
Two to four concurrent experiments depending on traffic, each run to a pre-declared sample size. No test gets stopped early because it looks good on day three.
Winners get hard-coded into the theme, losers get documented, and every result feeds the next round of hypotheses. The programme gets smarter each month.
Anonymised under NDA. Figures pulled from the client’s own analytics.
8-figure DTC brand, ~140 SKUs, US + CA · Shopify Plus (migrated from Magento 2)
Magento 2 cost $9k a month in hosting, extensions and emergency dev before a single feature shipped. Mobile LCP sat at 5.4 seconds and mobile converted at less than half the desktop rate across 68% of sessions. The named constraint: 11,412 indexed URLs and a top-3 organic position on their hero category, so a migration that lost rankings would cost more than the platform ever saved.
~$6M/yr DTC, 900+ SKUs across size and colour variants, US · Shopify Plus
Returns ran at 31% and refund cost consumed the entire paid media margin. One size chart image served 40 different fits, and 62% of add-to-carts started on a collection page that never showed variant availability. The named constraint: no new product photography budget, so every fix had to come out of the existing asset library and the review corpus.
“We'd been running our own tests for a year and calling every 3% swing a win. The first thing they did was tell us our sample sizes were garbage, which was not a fun call to sit through. Six months later we're getting wins that actually hold up when you re-measure them. Sitewide CVR went from 1.9% to 2.7%.”
Thirty minutes with the strategist who would actually run your account. We screen-share your store, read your data live, and tell you the three highest-value things we can see from the outside.
Prefer to write it out? [email protected] gets a real reply the same business day, Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm MT.