Merchant Center & Feed Rebuild
Disapprovals cleared at source, GTIN, MPN and attribute gaps closed, and titles rewritten to lead with searched terms. Custom labels for margin, stock cover and seasonality.
Google Ads here is about capturing the demand that already exists — and refusing to pay Bay Area prices for demand you would have got free.
Delivered remotely for brands across San Francisco and California.
Somebody in this metro has already decided they want a pour-over grinder, a magnesium supplement or a Sonoma cabernet; the account's only job is to be there when they type it. That framing matters more here than elsewhere because auction prices in this DMA are set by advertisers with enormous tolerance for loss, so any dollar spent on a query that was not going to convert is a dollar lost at a premium rate. The work is therefore mostly subtraction: negatives, query mining, and structure that keeps cheap demand from subsidising expensive guessing.
The single biggest lever in almost every account we inherit is the Merchant Center feed, and it is the least glamorous. Titles that lead with the brand name instead of the searched term, missing GTINs, unpopulated attributes, no custom labels for margin or stock cover, and a batch of silent disapprovals nobody has opened in months. Shopping and Performance Max spend your budget according to that feed, which means feed work is bid strategy whether or not anyone calls it that. For pre-order hardware, the availability attribute has to be set correctly or you are advertising a product Google believes is in stock and shipping tomorrow.
Then there is brand. A well-known Bay Area brand often finds that its impressive blended ROAS is mostly people searching its own name, which the store would have captured anyway. We split branded demand into its own campaign with its own budget and target, so non-brand performance becomes visible for the first time — and that number is usually the real conversation. Sometimes the honest recommendation is to reduce brand spend and stop counting it as growth.
The product mix San Francisco brands sell runs headfirst into Google's restricted categories more often than most. Alcohol advertising requires certification, restricts where and to whom it can serve, and Shopping for wine has its own eligibility rules by destination — worth solving before a holiday allocation release rather than during it. Supplements and skincare draw disapprovals for health claims lifted straight from the product description, so the fix usually lives in the catalogue rather than the ad copy. Connected devices with a battery or a cord trigger their own attribute and safety requirements. On top of that, California privacy rules mean a meaningful share of your visitors opt out of sale and sharing, which affects remarketing list sizes and enhanced conversions match rates; we set consent mode correctly and read the resulting numbers as reality rather than as a tracking bug to be worked around. Geographic targeting also deserves thought here, because a nine-county Bay Area radius and a national campaign behave nothing alike and should never share a budget.
The same standard of work we run for every client — applied to a San Francisco brand’s realities.
Full service detailDisapprovals cleared at source, GTIN, MPN and attribute gaps closed, and titles rewritten to lead with searched terms. Custom labels for margin, stock cover and seasonality.
Branded demand isolated into its own campaign, budget and target so non-brand performance becomes visible. Competitor conquesting runs as a separate line, judged separately.
Asset groups split by margin band and product type instead of one catch-all, with listing-group bids, product exclusions and brand-term controls applied wherever PMax still allows them.
A weekly pass over search terms and PMax category reports, with a maintained shared negative library so budget stops leaking into research, DIY and job-seeker queries.
Merchant promotions, sale price annotations, shipping and returns policy setup, product ratings, and local inventory ads where you have stores worth feeding.
Targets set from margin per product group rather than a platform default, moved in controlled increments, with a written reason attached to every bid and budget change.
We do not work off a rate card. Every San Francisco engagement starts with a fixed statement of work — named deliverables, named dates, one number — written after we have looked at your store, not before. If a smaller first step would serve you better, we will say so.
Get this scopedMerchant Center diagnostics, attribute coverage, campaign overlap and wasted spend scored against ninety days of search terms. You get the findings whether you hire us or not.
Titles, attributes, product types and custom labels rebuilt before any campaign work. A perfectly structured account on a bad feed still shows the wrong products to the wrong queries.
Brand, non-brand, Shopping, PMax and Search rebuilt with hard budget boundaries and a shared negative library, so each line answers a different commercial question.
tROAS targets derived from contribution margin by product group and applied gradually, so the account keeps its learning instead of resetting it every Monday.
Weekly query mining, monthly feed reviews, then expansion into the categories the search data says you can profitably win. Nothing scales before the query set is clean.
Anonymised under NDA. Figures pulled from the client’s own analytics.
~$6M/yr DTC, 900+ SKUs across size and colour variants, US · Shopify Plus
Returns ran at 31% and refund cost consumed the entire paid media margin. One size chart image served 40 different fits, and 62% of add-to-carts started on a collection page that never showed variant availability. The named constraint: no new product photography budget, so every fix had to come out of the existing asset library and the review corpus.
~$9M/yr, 210 SKUs, US + AU · Shopify Plus (migrated from BigCommerce)
Meta ROAS had slid from 3.6x to 1.9x in a year and the team had spent twelve months buying new creative to fix it. The real cause was measurement: the BigCommerce checkout dropped 22% of purchase events and the Conversions API had never been installed, so both ad platforms were optimising on incomplete data. The named constraint: peak season was 14 weeks out, and the replatform had to be live and stable well before Black Friday traffic arrived.
“Six thousand products and a Shopping feed nobody had touched since it was first generated — a third of it was disapproved and we had no idea. They rebuilt the feed off our real product data, fixed the GTIN and size attributes, and split brand off from non-brand so I could finally see what we were actually paying to acquire. They also cut the broad 'baby clothes' terms that were eating a quarter of the budget on people who were nowhere near buying. Spend is roughly flat and non-brand search revenue has close to doubled.”
Thirty minutes with the strategist who would actually run your account. We screen-share your store, read your data live, and tell you the three highest-value things we can see from the outside.
Prefer to write it out? [email protected] gets a real reply the same business day, Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm MT.