Conversion Research Sprint
Funnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
Structured experimentation for San Antonio stores where the biggest wins are usually fit guidance, shipping maths and the second language.
Delivered remotely for brands across San Antonio and Texas.
Most CRO programmes in this city do not begin with a button colour. They begin with a funnel that leaks in three specific, unglamorous places: the shopper reading in Spanish who hits an English checkout, the boot buyer who cannot work out whether to order a D or an EE, and the shipping cost that appears three steps too late on a case of sauce or a 500-pound pit. Those are not micro-optimisations. They are the difference between a store that converts and a store that collects traffic.
We start with research rather than a test queue: session replays split by language, site-search logs, checkout drop-off by step, and the support inbox — which in San Antonio is a very rich source, because the same four questions arrive daily in both languages. From that comes a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached, and a roadmap where every hypothesis has a stated sample size before it runs.
The testing discipline is the same as anywhere: pre-declared samples, a defined stopping rule, flicker-free implementation that does not damage page speed, and an honest read when a variant loses. What differs is the subject matter. Here the highest-value experiments tend to touch fit confidence, freight transparency, discount sequencing and language coverage, because those are where South Texas stores are losing orders that they have already paid to attract.
Three local frictions produce most of the recoverable revenue we find here. The first is bilingual drop-off: in a Hispanic-majority metro a meaningful share of sessions are reading in Spanish, and when the funnel switches back to English at the size guide, the shipping policy or the confirmation email, they abandon at a rate nobody is measuring because the analytics were never segmented by language. The second is fit. Boots, hats and leather are decided on width, last and break-in, and a size chart PDF does not answer that — better on-page guidance reduces both abandonment and the return that follows. The third is freight and weight. Cases of salsa and large cookers carry real shipping cost, and a free-shipping threshold picked by intuition either loses money on every order or scares off the cart. We model landed cost per zone first, then test the threshold and the way it is communicated, rather than testing a number that was never defensible. And around Lackland graduation weeks, a spike of out-of-town visitors browsing on phones makes mobile funnel behaviour worth reading separately from the annual average.
The same standard of work we run for every client — applied to a San Antonio brand’s realities.
Full service detailFunnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
Every hypothesis scored on impact, confidence and effort, with the projected revenue and required sample size stated up front. You always know what runs next and why.
Tests built and QA'd across devices, browsers and your app stack, with flicker-free rendering and no measurable hit to Core Web Vitals.
Pre-declared sample sizes, sequential-testing guardrails and segment-level readouts by device, traffic source and new versus returning. No peeking, no calling a test at 80%.
Cart drawer, shipping thresholds, payment options, express checkout placement and post-purchase upsell, tested against AOV and revenue per session rather than clicks.
Tests run, results in full, cumulative revenue impact and what the results taught us about your customers. Losers are reported in the same detail as winners.
We do not work off a rate card. Every San Antonio engagement starts with a fixed statement of work — named deliverables, named dates, one number — written after we have looked at your store, not before. If a smaller first step would serve you better, we will say so.
Get this scopedWe instrument the funnel properly first. Most stores have broken or double-counted events, and you cannot optimise against numbers you cannot trust.
Quant tells us where visitors leave. Qual tells us why. We combine analytics, replays and direct customer input before writing a single hypothesis.
Hypotheses are scored and sequenced so the highest-value, lowest-effort tests run first. The roadmap is shared and you can reorder it.
Two to four concurrent experiments depending on traffic, each run to a pre-declared sample size. No test gets stopped early because it looks good on day three.
Winners get hard-coded into the theme, losers get documented, and every result feeds the next round of hypotheses. The programme gets smarter each month.
Anonymised under NDA. Figures pulled from the client’s own analytics.
8-figure DTC brand, ~140 SKUs, US + CA · Shopify Plus (migrated from Magento 2)
Magento 2 cost $9k a month in hosting, extensions and emergency dev before a single feature shipped. Mobile LCP sat at 5.4 seconds and mobile converted at less than half the desktop rate across 68% of sessions. The named constraint: 11,412 indexed URLs and a top-3 organic position on their hero category, so a migration that lost rankings would cost more than the platform ever saved.
~$6M/yr DTC, 900+ SKUs across size and colour variants, US · Shopify Plus
Returns ran at 31% and refund cost consumed the entire paid media margin. One size chart image served 40 different fits, and 62% of add-to-carts started on a collection page that never showed variant availability. The named constraint: no new product photography budget, so every fix had to come out of the existing asset library and the review corpus.
“We'd been running our own tests for a year and calling every 3% swing a win. The first thing they did was tell us our sample sizes were garbage, which was not a fun call to sit through. Six months later we're getting wins that actually hold up when you re-measure them. Sitewide CVR went from 1.9% to 2.7%.”
Thirty minutes with the strategist who would actually run your account. We screen-share your store, read your data live, and tell you the three highest-value things we can see from the outside.
Prefer to write it out? [email protected] gets a real reply the same business day, Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm MT.