Conversion Research Sprint
Funnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
A test programme that knows the difference between a real lift and the fact that it is the first week of September.
Delivered remotely for brands across Boston and Massachusetts.
Boston is a difficult city to run a naive test programme in, and most of the damage is invisible. Traffic composition changes violently twice a year. A test that starts in mid-August and ends in mid-September has not measured a variant, it has measured a population change: the visitor mix moved from returning local customers to first-time student and parent buyers with different price sensitivity, different device behaviour and a completely different urgency profile. The variant wins, gets shipped, and quietly underperforms for the rest of the year.
So the calendar is part of the method here. Clean read windows sit in October and November, and again from late February through April once the winter volatility settles. Tests that must run through a pulse get segmented reads by new versus returning and by traffic source, and if the segments disagree we call it and rerun rather than banking a number we do not believe. Sample size is declared before the test starts, which matters more in a market where a single week can supply a quarter of the annual traffic.
The friction itself is local too. Wellness and supplement stores here lose people at the subscription decision, not the add-to-cart — the cancellation anxiety is the objection, so the pause and skip mechanics belong on the product page rather than buried in an account portal. Perishable food stores lose people at delivery uncertainty, where the winning changes are usually about showing the arrival date earlier rather than about the button. Outerwear stores lose people to fit and warmth doubt, which is a content and specification problem dressed up as a conversion one.
Almost every Boston brand with campus exposure is serving two people at once and reporting them as one number. The student buys on a phone, late, price-conscious, comparing, often influenced by something a friend has. The parent buys remotely on the student's behalf, at a higher AOV, from a desktop, with gifting and delivery-date requirements the student never has, and with a completely different tolerance for shipping cost. Blended into a single conversion rate they cancel each other out and the roadmap gets built on an average that describes nobody. We split them at the analysis layer using device, source, shipping-address behaviour and order composition, then test against each separately — the gift-message and delivery-date work that lifts the parent path usually does nothing for the student path, and that is fine as long as you know which one you moved.
The same standard of work we run for every client — applied to a Boston brand’s realities.
Full service detailFunnel analysis, session replays, heatmaps, on-site polls and user tests across your top revenue templates. Output is a ranked list of friction points with revenue attached.
Every hypothesis scored on impact, confidence and effort, with the projected revenue and required sample size stated up front. You always know what runs next and why.
Tests built and QA'd across devices, browsers and your app stack, with flicker-free rendering and no measurable hit to Core Web Vitals.
Pre-declared sample sizes, sequential-testing guardrails and segment-level readouts by device, traffic source and new versus returning. No peeking, no calling a test at 80%.
Cart drawer, shipping thresholds, payment options, express checkout placement and post-purchase upsell, tested against AOV and revenue per session rather than clicks.
Tests run, results in full, cumulative revenue impact and what the results taught us about your customers. Losers are reported in the same detail as winners.
We do not work off a rate card. Every Boston engagement starts with a fixed statement of work — named deliverables, named dates, one number — written after we have looked at your store, not before. If a smaller first step would serve you better, we will say so.
Get this scopedWe instrument the funnel properly first. Most stores have broken or double-counted events, and you cannot optimise against numbers you cannot trust.
Quant tells us where visitors leave. Qual tells us why. We combine analytics, replays and direct customer input before writing a single hypothesis.
Hypotheses are scored and sequenced so the highest-value, lowest-effort tests run first. The roadmap is shared and you can reorder it.
Two to four concurrent experiments depending on traffic, each run to a pre-declared sample size. No test gets stopped early because it looks good on day three.
Winners get hard-coded into the theme, losers get documented, and every result feeds the next round of hypotheses. The programme gets smarter each month.
Anonymised under NDA. Figures pulled from the client’s own analytics.
8-figure DTC brand, ~140 SKUs, US + CA · Shopify Plus (migrated from Magento 2)
Magento 2 cost $9k a month in hosting, extensions and emergency dev before a single feature shipped. Mobile LCP sat at 5.4 seconds and mobile converted at less than half the desktop rate across 68% of sessions. The named constraint: 11,412 indexed URLs and a top-3 organic position on their hero category, so a migration that lost rankings would cost more than the platform ever saved.
~$6M/yr DTC, 900+ SKUs across size and colour variants, US · Shopify Plus
Returns ran at 31% and refund cost consumed the entire paid media margin. One size chart image served 40 different fits, and 62% of add-to-carts started on a collection page that never showed variant availability. The named constraint: no new product photography budget, so every fix had to come out of the existing asset library and the review corpus.
“We'd been running our own tests for a year and calling every 3% swing a win. The first thing they did was tell us our sample sizes were garbage, which was not a fun call to sit through. Six months later we're getting wins that actually hold up when you re-measure them. Sitewide CVR went from 1.9% to 2.7%.”
Thirty minutes with the strategist who would actually run your account. We screen-share your store, read your data live, and tell you the three highest-value things we can see from the outside.
Prefer to write it out? [email protected] gets a real reply the same business day, Mon-Fri, 9am-6pm MT.