When a Twin Cities brand gets a Vendor Central invitation, it looks familiar and reassuring: a purchase order arrives, you ship a pallet, you invoice, somebody else handles the customer. It is the model this market was built on. What comes with it is control of your retail price handed to an algorithm, chargebacks and allowances that arrive as deductions rather than as a conversation, and a listing whose pricing behaviour your other retail buyers can see from their desks. Seller Central is more work and keeps the price, the inventory and the customer-facing content with you. That decision is worth more than everything else on this page combined, and it is worth making deliberately rather than by accepting an email.
The MAP question follows immediately. A brand that has spent years protecting its pricing with retail partners cannot let a marketplace listing become the reference price the whole channel prices against — and it will, because buyers check. So we set the marketplace assortment and pack architecture up so the comparison is not like for like: distinct multi-packs, marketplace-appropriate configurations, and a clear line between what a stockist carries and what a marketplace buyer can find. Where unauthorised sellers are already dumping stock, Brand Registry gets you control of the listing and the supply investigation tells you which account is leaking.
Then the operational half, which in Minnesota is mostly about stock and time. Fulfilment placement decided per SKU against real size tiers and return rates, replenishment planned so inventory is in position before demand arrives rather than after, and advertising judged on TACoS against margin after fees. And throughout it, the framing that makes this worth doing at all: the marketplace is where somebody finds you, and your own store is where the full assortment, the bundles and the email relationship live.